30b8e87e-5a94-4c11-bccd-ec951fba758d beie director@blueeyesintelligence.org 10.35940/ijrte.B7666.0712223 "Code Review Developer Guide," [Online]. Available: https://google.github.io/eng-practices/review/.O. B. L. G. Y. C. M. W. G. Oleksii Kononenko, "Investigating Code Review Quality," p. 10, 2015."Best practices for reviewing a code," [Online]. Available: https://www.codegrip.tech/productivity/best-practices-for-reviewing-code/."Benefits of Code Review: Every Team Must Know [2022 Guides]," [Online]. Available: https://gaper.io/benefits-of-code-review/.[Online].Available:https://about.gitlab.com/topics/version-control/what-is-code-review/#:~:text=Code%20reviews%2C%20also%20known%20as,developers%20learn%20the%20source%20code.[Online]. Available: https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/how-to-avoid-code-review-pitfalls-that-slow-your-productivity-down-b7a8536c4d3b/.10.1109/MS.2012.175Bacchelli, A., & Bird, C. (2013). Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review. IEEE Software, 30(4), 84-91. doi: 10.1109/MS.2012.175 [CrossRef]10.1109/MS.2013.104Baltes, S., & Diehl, S. (2014). Improving software quality through code review: A case study. IEEE Software, 31(4), 60-67. doi: 10.1109/MS.2013.104 [CrossRef]Kemerer, C. F., & Porter, L. F. (1992). Improving software quality through a formal technical review process. Journal of Systems and Software, 19(2), 119-131. doi: 10.1016/0164-1212(92)90074-f10.1145/2491411.2491444P. C. Rigby and C. Bird, "Convergent contemporary software peer review practices," in Proceedings of the 2013 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE), 2013, pp. 202-212. [CrossRef]10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606617A. Bacchelli and C. Bird, "Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review," in Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 2013, pp. 712-721. [CrossRef]10.1145/2597073.2597082Beller, M., Bacchelli, A., Zaidman, A., & Juergens, E. (2014). Modern code reviews in open-source projects: which problems do they fix? In Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (pp. 202-211). [CrossRef]Bosu, A., Greiler, M., Bird, C.: 'Characteristics of useful code reviews: an empirical study at microsoft'. Proc. of the 2010.1049/iet-sen.2020.0134M. Jureczko, Ł. Kajda, and P. Górecki, "Code review effectiveness: An empirical study on selected factors influence," IET Software, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 794-805, 2020. [CrossRef]J. &. K. Y. Shimagaki, "The effect of reviewer's expertise on code review outcomes," 2018.Devart Software, "Code Review Benefits," [Online]. Available: https://www.devart.com/review-assistant/learnmore/benefits.html.10.1145/253228.253250M. Stein, J. Riedl, S.J. Harner and V. Mashayekhi, "A Case Study of Distributed Asynchronous Software Inspections," in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering, New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, 1997, pp. 107-117. [CrossRef]10.1109/ICSE-COMPANION.2009.5070996A. Sutherland and G. Venolia, "Can peer code reviews be exploited for later information needs?," in Proceedings of ICSE, may 2009 [CrossRef]10.1142/9789812389701_0023O. Laitenberger, "A Survey of Software Inspection Technologies," in Handbook on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 1, World Scientific Publishing Co., 2002, pp. 517-555. [CrossRef]10.1145/268411.268421A. Porter, H. Siy, A. Mockus and L. Votta, "Understanding the sources of variation in software inspections," in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 41-79, Jan. 1998. [CrossRef]10.1109/32.825763Sauer, C., Jeffery, D.R., Land, L., et al.: 'The effectiveness of software development technical reviews: A behaviorally motivated program of research', IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 2000, 26, (1), pp. 1-14 [CrossRef]10.1109/SANER.2015.7081827R. Morales, S. McIntosh and F. Khomh, "Do code review practices impact design quality? A case study of the Qt, VTK, and ITK projects," 2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), Montreal, QC, 2015, pp. 171-180. [CrossRef]10.1145/3131151.3131161Dos Santos, E.W., Nunes, I.: 'Investigating the effectiveness of peer code review in distributed software development'. Proc. of the 2017 Brazilian Symp. on Software Engineering, 2017, pp. 84-93 [CrossRef]10.1109/ICSME.2018.00061Ebert, F., Castor, F., Novielli, N., et al.: 'Communicative intention in code review questions'. Proc. of the 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. on Software Maintenance and Evolution, 2018, pp. 519-523 [CrossRef]In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Program ComprehensionCaulo230202010.1145/3387904.3389270Knowledge Transfer in Modern Code ReviewCaulo, M., Lin, B., Bavota, G., Scanniello, G., & Lanza, M. (2020). Knowledge Transfer in Modern Code Review. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Program Comprehension, pp. 230-240. [CrossRef]