1e416013186c20a17cb-1147 20230519055200632 beie:beie director@blueeyesintelligence.org WEB-FORM International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) IJRTE 22773878 10.35940/ijrte.2277-3878 https://www.ijrte.org/ 05 30 2023 12 1 Nanoé Company - Decentralized Electrification, Ambanja, Madagascar. Sandaniaina Sedinirina Andriamihaingo Ranaivoson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5777-8089 Nicolas Saincy Nanoé Company - Decentralized Electrification, Madagascar. Eric Jean Roy Sambatra School of Industrial Engineering, Higher Institute of Technology, Antsiranana, Madagascar. Todizara Andrianajaina Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School, Antsiranana, Madagascar. Nirinason Jean Razafinjaka Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School, Antsiranana, Madagascar. The objective of this paper is to perform a laboratory test on the performance of MPPT control in a nanogrid. The components used for tests are described, namely (i) a PV module SPP031001200 manufactured by Victron energy, a prototype of a synchronous buck converter controlled by Arduino Atmel ATmega V-2560, and a DC electronic load programmable 72-13210 manufactured by TENMATM. Among several MPPT controls, the choice falls on the methods Perturb and Observe “P&O” and Increment of the conductance “INC” which are more widely used than others. Laboratory tests with different PV module conditions and variable output voltage were performed. In full sunlight, the input power of the buck converter gives a better result with the INC method compared to the P&O method. For a PV module exposed to horizontal or vertical total shading, INC method gives a small advantage compared to the P&O method, which can be beneficial for a long time. Compared to the P&O method, INC method always gives better results due to its more complex algorithm. Due to the lack of measuring instruments, the different tests were performed without considering irradiance and temperature. 05 30 2023 95 101 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 10.35940/BEIESP.CrossMarkPolicy www.ijrte.org true No, I did not receive. No conflicts of interest to the best of our knowledge. No, the article does not require ethical approval and consent to participate with evidence. Not relevant. All authors have equal participation in this article. 10.35940/ijrte.A7626.0512123 https://www.ijrte.org/portfolio-item/A76260512123/