Protection of the Youth Interests in Social Conflicts: Potential of Social Institutions
Valentin Babintsev1, Alexey Ushamirskiy2, Yana Serkina3, Irina Gukova4
1Valentin Babintsev, Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russian Federation.
2Alexey Ushamirskiy, Volga Institute of Economics, Pedagogy and Law, Volzhsky, Russian Federation.
3Yana Serkina, Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russian Federation.
4Irina Gukova, Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russian Federation.
Manuscript received on 17 August 2019. | Revised Manuscript received on 24 August 2019. | Manuscript published on 30 September 2019. | PP: 8255-8258 | Volume-8 Issue-3 September 2019 | Retrieval Number: C6573098319/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.C6573.098319
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: The problem of involvement of the main social institutions in implementation and protection of the youth interests in social conflicts has been analyzed. At that, the social institutions are thought of as the conventionally accepted group behaviour rules, which structure the social interactions in the sociocultural environment. It has been indicated that the ability of social institutions to implement and protect the youth interests in social conflicts is determined by their juvenile potential, representing the willingness and ability of the social institution to adequately reflect the nature of the youth interests in the minds of their representatives; to understand the way to create conditions for implementation thereof without detracting from the interests of the other social groups and society as a whole; to set the conditions and mechanisms for the protection of the youth interests in the event of hazards or threats. The juvenile potential structure, including cognitive, informational, motivational, axiological and praxeological elements, has been considered. The state of these elements has been empirically assessed as of the main social institutions in Russia.
Keywords: Youth, Social Conflict, Social Institute, Social Institution, the Juvenile Potential of the Social Institution.
Scope of the Article: Social Sciences