Comparison of Different Project Management Systems in Terms of Project Life Cycle Assessment in The Construction Industry
Mohammad Hossein Zaeimbashi Isaabadi1, Ehsan Harirchian, Emad Kasra Kermanshahi2, Ali Bagheri Fard3
1Mohammad Hossein Zaeimbashi Isaabadi, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University Technology Malaysia (UTM), Skudai, Malaysia.
2Ehsan Harirchian, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University Technology Malaysia (UTM), Skudai, Malaysia. Emad Kasra Kermanshahi, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University Technology Malaysia (UTM), Skudai, Malaysia.
3Ali Bageri Fard, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University Technology Malaysia (UTM), Skudai, Malaysia.
Manuscript received on 23 May 2015 | Revised Manuscript received on 30 May 2015 | Manuscript published on 30 May 2015 | PP: 72-74 | Volume-4 Issue-2, May 2015 | Retrieval Number: B1420054215©BEIESP
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: Assessment means to evaluate how effective a process is. For this, a proper framework has to be developed such that the process can be managed, its products can be measured and areas needing improvements can be identified. Such a framework will have to be developed for all processes that considerably affect the execution of a project. This paper proposes a comparison between Lean management, 5S process, Six-Sigma, Value Management and Value Engineering framework for the Construction project life cycle process in the construction industry, which will assist in assessment and finding improvement opportunities in the application of management system in managing the construction project life cycle.
Keyword: Project management, Construction industry, Project Life Cycle.
Scope of the Article: Digital Rights Management