Constant Flux Control N-level Drive Application for Industries
Urmila Bandaru1, M.Siva Satyanarayana2, N. Deepthi3, L. Rajasekhar Goud4
1Dr. Urmila Bandaru, G. Pulla Reddy Engineering College, Kurnool (A.P), India.
2Dr. M.Siva Satyanarayana, G. Pulla Reddy Engineering College, Kurnool (A.P), India.
3N. Deepthi, Dr. KV Subba Reddy College of Engineering for Women, Kurnool (A.P), India.
4Dr. L. Rajasekhar Goud, G. Pulla Reddy Engineering College, Kurnool (A.P), India.
Manuscript received on 22 March 2019 | Revised Manuscript received on 03 April 2019 | Manuscript Published on 18 April 2019 | PP: 308-310 | Volume-7 Issue-6S March 2019 | Retrieval Number: F02580376S19/2019©BEIESP
Open Access | Editorial and Publishing Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: The two level conventional converters are slowly substituted by multilevel converters because of mitigated THD and stress reduction on power semiconductor switch. The rigorous survey performed on various industrial applications using variable speed drive with 2-level and N-level inverter lies in selecting the topology and control methods. For different applications, one control method may be suitable to avail good characteristics. In this paper, the techniques SPWM and SVPWM applied on 9-level diode clamped N-level inverter operated induction machine are compared for various industrial applications. The analysis concludes: For speed control and at high and normal MI, SPWM is preferable and at low and normal mi values, SVPWM is preferred in constant V/f method of induction machine.
Keywords: SPWM, SVPWM, SCMM, MCMM.
Scope of the Article: Quality Control