Scrutinizing DEEC, TDEEC, BEENISH and IBEENISH Protocol in Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network’s (WSN’s)
V. Baby Shalini
Baby Shalini, Department of Information Technology, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education College, Krishnankoil (Tamil Nadu), India.
Manuscript received on 02 December 2019 | Revised Manuscript received on 20 December 2019 | Manuscript Published on 31 December 2019 | PP: 723-728 | Volume-8 Issue-4S2 December 2019 | Retrieval Number: D11171284S219/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.D1117.1284S219
Open Access | Editorial and Publishing Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: WSN’s involve abundant sensor’s with inadequate power, which will dispatch the monitored information to the Base Station (BS) which needs extra energy. Clustering is a key strategy for enhancing the sensor network lifespan by diminishing the energy consumption. Energy competent clustering practice be supposed to be delineated for heterogeneous WSN. Effectiveness of heterogeneous protocols deteriorates while altering the heterogeneity. In this paper work, Distributed Energy Efficient Clustering (DEEC) was investigated first, at that point Threshold DEEC (TDEEC), Balanced Energy Efficient Network Integrated Super Heterogeneous (BEENISH) and Improved BEENISH (IBEENISH) under more than a few scenarios were examined and then outcomes were compared. In all four cases, Cluster Heads (CH’s) were preferred with respect to the remnant energy of sensor’s. Observations made thoroughly concerning the performance on the bases of network lifespan and packets received by the BS. IBEENISH performs superior than other existing protocols like DEEC, TDEEC and BEENISH.
Keywords: Clustering, Heterogeneous, Residual Energy, Cluster Head.
Scope of the Article: Network Protocols & Wireless Networks